Current:Home > FinanceSupreme Court looks at whether Medicare and Medicaid were overbilled under fraud law-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Supreme Court looks at whether Medicare and Medicaid were overbilled under fraud law
View Date:2024-12-23 23:18:01
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on Tuesday in a case that could undermine one of the government's most powerful tools for fighting fraud in government contracts and programs.
The False Claims Act dates back to the Civil War, when it was enacted to combat rampant fraud by private contractors who were overbilling or simply not delivering goods to the troops. But the law over time was weakened by congressional amendments.
Then, in 1986, Congress toughened the law, and then toughened it again. The primary Senate sponsor was — and still is — Iowa Republican Charles Grassley.
"We wanted to anticipate and block every avenue that creative lawyers ... might use to allow a contractor to escape liability for overcharging," Grassley said in an interview with NPR.
He is alarmed by the case before the Supreme Court this week. At issue is whether hundreds of major retail pharmacies across the country knowingly overcharged Medicaid and Medicare by overstating what their usual and customary prices were. If they did, they would be liable for triple damages.
What the pharmacies charged
The case essentially began in 2006, when Walmart upended the retail pharmacy world by offering large numbers of frequently used drugs at very cheap prices — $4 for a 30-day supply — with automatic refills. That left the rest of the retail pharmacy industry desperately trying to figure out how to compete.
The pharmacies came up with various offers that matched Walmart's prices for cash customers, but they billed Medicaid and Medicare using far higher prices, not what are alleged to be their usual and customary prices.
Walmart did report its discounted cash prices as usual and customary, but other chains did not. Even as the discounted prices became the majority of their cash sales, other retail pharmacies continued to bill the government at the previous and far higher prices.
For example, between 2008 and 2012, Safeway charged just $10 for almost all of its cash sales for a 90-day supply of a top-selling drug to reduce cholesterol. But it did not report $10 as its usual and customary price. Instead, Safeway told Medicare and Medicaid that its usual and customary price ranged from $81 to $109.
How the whistleblowers responded
Acting under the False Claims Act, two whistleblowers brought suit on behalf of the government alleging that SuperValu and Safeway bilked taxpayers of $200 million.
But the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the chains had not acted knowingly, even if they "might suspect, believe, or intend to file a false claim." And the appeals court further said that evidence about what the executives knew was "irrelevant" as a matter of law.
The whistleblowers appealed to the Supreme Court, joined by the federal government, 33 states and Sen. Grassley.
"It's just contrary to what we intended," Grassley said. "That test just makes a hash of the law of fraud."
The statute is very specific, he observes. It says that a person or business knowingly defrauds the government when it presents a false or fraudulent claim for payment. And it defines "knowingly" as: "actual knowledge," "deliberate ignorance" or "reckless disregard of the truth or falsity" of the claim.
"These are three distinct mental states," Grassley said, "and it can be any one of them."
The companies' defense
SuperValu and Safeway would not allow their lawyers to be interviewed for this story, but in their briefs, they argue that a strict intent requirement is needed to hold businesses accountable under the statute. That is to ensure that companies have fair notice of what is and is not legal. The companies are backed by a variety of business interests, among them defense contractors represented by lawyer Beth Brinkmann in this case.
Brinkmann maintains the False Claims Act is a punitive law because it imposes harsh monetary penalties for wrongful conduct without clear enough agency guidance. Ultimately, she argues, the question is not one of facts.
"If there's more than one reasonable interpretation of the law," Brinkmann said, "you don't know it's false."
Tejinder Singh, representing the whistleblowers, scoffs at that interpretation, calling it an after-the-fact justification for breaking the law.
"It has nothing to do with what you believe at the time you acted," Singh said, "and has everything to do with what you make up afterwards."
A decision in the case is expected by summer.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Lions find way to win, Bears in tough spot: Best (and worst) from NFL Week 10
- Carrie Actress Samantha Weinstein Dead at 28 After Cancer Battle
- Would Ryan Seacrest Like to Be a Dad One Day? He Says…
- Vaccination and awareness could help keep mpox in check this summer
- Tennis Channel suspends reporter after comments on Barbora Krejcikova's appearance
- Cap & Trade Shows Its Economic Muscle in the Northeast, $1.3B in 3 Years
- In Australia’s Burning Forests, Signs We’ve Passed a Global Warming Tipping Point
- OceanGate co-founder calls for optimism amid search for lost sub
- Congress heard more testimony about UFOs: Here are the biggest revelations
- Khloe Kardashian and Tristan Thompson’s Baby Boy’s Name Finally Revealed 9 Months After Birth
Ranking
- Who will save Florida athletics? Gators need fixing, and it doesn't stop at Billy Napier
- How a 93-year-old visited every national park and healed a family rift in the process
- Search for missing OceanGate sub ramps up near Titanic wreck with deep-sea robot scanning ocean floor
- Hundreds of sea lions and dolphins are turning up dead on the Southern California coast. Experts have identified a likely culprit.
- Pentagon secrets leaker Jack Teixeira set to be sentenced, could get up to 17 years in prison
- He helped cancer patients find peace through psychedelics. Then came his diagnosis
- An abortion doula explains the impact of North Carolina's expanded limitations
- Sharon Stone Serves Up Sliver of Summer in Fierce Bikini Photo
Recommendation
-
Kirk Herbstreit berates LSU fans throwing trash vs Alabama: 'Enough is enough, clowns'
-
Big City Mayors Around the World Want Green Stimulus Spending in the Aftermath of Covid-19
-
Sudanese doctors should not have to risk their own lives to save lives
-
Khloe Kardashian and Tristan Thompson’s Baby Boy’s Name Finally Revealed 9 Months After Birth
-
Philadelphia mass transit users face fare hikes of more than 20% and possible service cuts
-
Inside Harry Styles' Special Bond With Stevie Nicks
-
Building Emissions Cuts Crucial to Meeting NYC Climate Goals
-
Overstock.com wins auction for Bed Bath and Beyond's assets